We are going mid September and are booked at John Muir Lodge as we couldn't get into the Wuksachi Lodge. We have 3 nights before heading to Yosemite so roughly 2 full days. Our main interest is big trees, General Sherman, Big Trees trail, Congress Trail, Moro Rock. These are all in the South and an hour away from the lodge. They are also about an hour away from Three Rivers.
Wondering if we should just get a place in Three Rivers as the cost is significantly less and the accommodations are significantly better. Looks like we are about the same distance away. Since we only have 2 full days I'm thinking this is plenty for this time around. We can leave through Kings Canyon and explore something the last day if it's cool.
Thoughts?
For a mid-September visit to Sequoia and Kings Canyon with only 2 full days, your lodging choice depends on your priorities: convenience, cost, and comfort. John Muir Lodge is inside the park, which gives you early access to trails and sights, but Three Rivers accommodations are generally cheaper and more comfortable, and the drive to the main attractions is similar—about an hour either way.
Given your interests—General Sherman Tree, Big Trees Trail, Congress Trail, Moro Rock—you’ll spend most of your time in the Giant Forest and nearby areas. Here’s a breakdown of considerations:
Since you have only 2 full days, you could structure your visit like this:
Overall, staying in Three Rivers makes sense for your short visit. The slight extra drive is negligible compared to the savings and comfort, and you’ll still be able to access all the key trails and attractions efficiently. Staying inside the park would mainly benefit those wanting to catch sunrise or avoid any drive at all, but for 2 days, Three Rivers is plenty practical.