Alaska for Northern Lights: Anchorage, Fairbanks, or …?

Question

Considering visiting for three days/nights in September, around the equinox to see the Aurora. Considering my screen name you’d think we’d have seen them before, but nope.

Flights from SNA (our closest airport) are basically the same cost to Fairbanks or Anchorage. Obviously there are more daytime activities in Anchorage, but are the chances of seeing lights the same in both cities? We’d be taking tours and not renting a car.

Or should we be considering some other destination in Alaska? We do want to limit our choices to places one stop from SNA, which may be restricting some choices, and a destination with things to do during the days.

Thanks for the feedback!

Answer

For a three-day/night trip to Alaska in September around the equinox to see the Northern Lights (Aurora Borealis), both Anchorage and Fairbanks are viable options, but they offer different experiences and probabilities for aurora viewing.

Anchorage:

Anchorage is the largest city in Alaska, offering plenty of daytime activities such as museums, wildlife centers, scenic trails, and cultural tours. The city is at a lower latitude than Fairbanks, which slightly reduces the probability of seeing strong auroras, but it’s still possible on clear nights. Since you won’t be renting a car, Anchorage is convenient for guided tours that take you out of the city lights to aurora viewing spots.

Pros: More daytime activities, easier logistics without a car, wide range of accommodation and guided tours.
Cons: Lower probability of seeing aurora compared to more northern locations, light pollution from the city may limit visibility if not on a tour outside urban areas.

Fairbanks:

Fairbanks is located further north and is within the “aurora oval,” making it one of the best places in the world for consistent Northern Lights viewing. Many guided tours and lodges specialize in aurora viewing, often including heated viewing cabins or wilderness excursions. The city is smaller, so daytime activities are more limited than Anchorage, but you can still enjoy riverboat tours, museums, and nearby hot springs.

Pros: Higher probability of seeing aurora, specialized tours and accommodations, less light pollution.
Cons: Fewer daytime attractions compared to Anchorage, September weather can be colder, fewer direct activities in town without tours.

Other considerations:

Both cities are accessible with one-stop flights from SNA, so flight convenience is similar.
If you want to maximize aurora viewing probability, Fairbanks is superior. If you prefer a balance of daytime activities and aurora opportunities, Anchorage is a solid choice.
Some travelers consider splitting nights between Anchorage and a northern lodge near Fairbanks for the best combination, but with only three nights, staying in one location is simpler.
Guided aurora tours are highly recommended in either location, especially if you do not have a car, as they take you to darker locations away from city lights.

Recommendation: For a three-day trip where you also want daytime activities and no car rental, Anchorage is a convenient base with reasonable aurora chances. If your primary goal is to maximize Northern Lights sightings and you are okay with a smaller city and more structured daytime activities, Fairbanks is the better choice.

Alaska for Northern Lights: Anchorage, Fairbanks, or …?

More Alaska (AK) Travel Questions

The attractions mentioned in this question

Popular Destinations

Popular Travel Questions